Ranabothu Pulla Reddy v. The State Of Telangana Rep By Its Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.22244 of 2015 BETWEEN E.Pulla Reddy ... PETITIONERS AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:

ORDER:- Heard.

2. Petitioner complains of inaction on the part of the Tahsildar in spite of oral complaints relating to unauthorized bore well said to have been dug by respondent Nos.3 and 4. Present writ petition is filed requesting for a Mandamus to respondent No.2 to act on the complaint.

3. Admittedly, petitioner has not filed any written complaint before respondent No.2. Hence, the direction, as sought for, cannot be issued. If the petitioner is aggrieved, he is at liberty to make appropriate representation

before the Tahsildar, who shall look into it and take appropriate action as it warrants.

Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J July 20, 2015 LMV