High Court for State of TelanganaWP/29195/2017dismissed

Kum. Mehanaz Kousar, D/O. Mehataz Begum, v. The Union Of India Rep By Its Secretary, Govt Of India,

2017-10-25V Ramasubramanian,Abhinand Kumar Shavili3 pages

* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN * HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE ABHI NAND KUMAR SHAVI LI + W.P.NO.29195 of 2017 % Date: 25-10-2017 # Betw een:

1. Kum. Mehanaz Kousar, D/o. Mehataz Begum,

2. Smt. Mehataz Begum, W/o. Kareem Baig, both are R/o. D.No.15271, Medharabazar, Chilakaluripeta, Guntur District. ..... Petitioners And

1. The Union of India rep. by its Secretary, Govt. of India, Medical and Health Department, New Delhi.

2. The Medical Council of India, Govt. of India, MBBS-2017, Pocket14, Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi, Rep. by its Secretary.

3. The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), NEET - 2017, rep. by its Chairman, Shikasha Kendra, 2-Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi - 110 092.

4. NTR University of Medical Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. rep. by its Registrar.

5. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue Department) Secretariat Buildings at Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

.... Respondents ! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. S.M. Subhan ^ Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Mr. K. Lakshman, ASG ^ Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vivekchandra Sekhar S.

^ Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Mrs. A. Chaya Devi ^ Counsel for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Taddi Nageswara Rao ^ Counsel for Respondent No.5 : G.P. for Revenue (A.P) < GI ST:

> HEAD NOTE:

? Cases referred

VRS,J & AKS,J.

W.P.No.29195/2017 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE ABHI NAND KUMAR SHAVI LI WRI T PETI TI ON No.29195 of 2017 ORDER: (Per VRS,J) The 1st petitioner, who belongs to the Muslim minority community on account of which she is entitled to be treated as a candidate belonging to BC-E in the quota reserved for such candidates, has come up with the above writ petition challenging the action of the university in not granting her the benefit of reservation.

2. Heard Mr. S.M. Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Taddi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the University.

3. Unfortunately in the application that the petitioner filed, she indicated her caste category as "OC". This was despite the 1st petitioner belonging to the Muslim community. Therefore, there was no fault on the part of the University.

4. Now the last date for admission for the current academic year is also already over. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as no relief can be granted to the petitioners.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J.

_________________________ ABHI NAND KUMAR SHAVI LI , J.

25th October, 2017 Js.

VRS,J & AKS,J.

W.P.No.29195/2017 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE ABHI NAND KUMAR SHAVI LI WRI T PETI TI ON No.29195 of 2017 25th October, 2017 Js.