Rakesh Kore v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6020 OF 2022 Between:

1. Rakesh Kore, S/o. Sathaiah, aged 25 years, Occ. Electrician, No. 11-24, Ramnagar, Athmakur (M), Nalgonda District.

2. Ch. Padma alias Lalitha,, Wo. Venkatesh, Aged 40 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o- Dayanand Nagar, Boduppal, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Narsimha Kore, S/o. Beeraiah Aged 44 years, Occ. Driver, Rl/o. Chilkanagar, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District.

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad.

2. The Station House Officer, Atmakur (M) Police Station, Rachakonda.

3. Jama Mounika, D/o. Rajaramulu, W/o. Rakesh Kore, aged 23 years, Ryo. 1124, Ramnagar, Athmakur (M), Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in respect of Crime No. 74t2O22, on the file of the 2nd respondent Police Station by imposing any terms and conditions. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. K. Annapurna Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3.

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6O2O of2O22 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.p.C. by petitioners/A 1 to .A3 seeking bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.74 of 2022 on the hle of Atmakur (M) police !

t Station, Rachakonda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376(21(n),417, 42O,323, 506 of Indian penal Code and under Sections 3( 1)(r)(s) , z(21(v), 3(21(va) of scheduled caste and Scheduled Tribes POA Act.

2'

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State and perused the record. 3.

The present application is filed on \S.OZ.2O22 and thereafter the case has under gone several adjournments on the ground that compromise was effected in between the parties. This Court had granted order of not to arrest the petitioners/Accused. Further, according to the petitioners, the proceedings are still pending before the quash Court. In the said circumstances, I find no reasons to further extend the orders granted earlier.

5.

Accordingly the present Criminal Petition is disposed of' However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek any remedy before the quash court.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.

SD/.K.ONESIM DEPUTY REGlSTRAR //TRUE COPY// q \ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Alair.

2. The Station House Officer, Atmakur (M) police Station, Rachakonda, Nalgonda District.

3. One CC to Smt. K. Annapurna Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]

4. Two ccs to the Pubric Prosecutor, High court foithe Stite of rerangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy gbrA-

HIGH COURT DATED: 1910912022 or.i q 2 [ 1,1[\ ?$Il

ORDER

,, )} CRLP.No.6020 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE CRL.P \r-', \<