M.Radhika v. S Jayamma

l

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3173 OF 2018 Petition under Article 227 ol the Constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High,Court may be pleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the docket order dr.2-2- 2018 passed by the Xlll additional District and sessions Judge, R.R. District, at LB Nager.

Between:

M. Radhika, Wo. Bikshapathi, Aged 49 years, Occ- House Wife, Rlo. 42-14211 , Mahatma Gandhinagar, Moulaali, Malakjgiri, R.R. District.

Petitioner/Plaintiff AND

1. S.Jayamma, Wo. S. Yadagiri, Aged 5 6 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. 1-9-136, Kushaiguda, Keesara (M), R.R. District

2. P. Umavathi @ Umadevi, D/o. Late K. Narsimha, Aged 57 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. Plot No.2, Road No.2, Chandrapuri Colony, Chintalkunta Check Post, L.B. Nagar, R.R. District.

3. K. Krishna Swamy, S/o. Late K. Narsimha, Aged 55 years, Occ-Business, R/o. 5-1 17, Jahangir Nagar Colony, Chintalkunta, Hayathnagar (M), R.R. District

4. K. Srinivas,, S/o. Late. K. Narsimha, Aged 53 years, Oer- Business, R/o. 5- l17, Jahangir Nagar Colony, Chintalkunta, Hayathnagar (M), R.R. District. ... Respondents/Defendants (Respondents No. 1& 2 are not necessary parties to this petition.

lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.NO.288/2009 pending on the file of the 13th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. For the Petitioners: Sri V. Satyam Reddy, Advocate For the Respondents:

The Court made the following: ORDER

TTIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CwIL REVISION PETITION No.3173 of 2Ot8 ORDER:

Today when the matter has come up before this Court for hearing, learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that during the pendency of the instant civil Revision petition, the trial court has disposed of the main suit i.e., o.s.No.28B of 2oo9, therefore the cause in the civil Revision Petition does not survive and has become infructuous.

2.

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this civil Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand closed.

SD/. MOMINA MEHAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER To, 1 E" Xlll additional District and sess.ions Judge, R.R. District, at LB Nager

2. One CC to SriV. Satyam Reddy, Advocate tdpUCt

3. Two CD Copies KNK JIlR

HIGH COURT DATED:'18/0812025 "-a'

.E S; i..i; i ,":,, z'. ) a' ,.

22CicM ..:,

ORDER

CRP No 3173 of 2018 REVISION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS, NO COST .^T.jtL , (6)" tr,\ v ^\{1,'

b\