Chanthapally Panduranga Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

[ 32e6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:22516 OF 2023 Between:

Chanthapally Panduranga Reddy, Age 45 Years, 1-88, Occ ; Business, MekaGuda, Kothur, Rangareddy, T.S -509228.

.....PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State'

2. The Director, Prohibition and Excise' Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana State'

3. The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department' M J Market' Hyderabad, Telangana.

4. The Dy Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department, M J Market, Hyderabad' Telangana'

.....RES,.NDENT'

Petition Under Artic|e 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction or more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the respondents in issuing the notification vide G.o.Ms.No.86 dated 01-o8-2O23 is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of the principles of natural justice' t.A.NO:1 OF 2023 Petition Under Section 151 cPC pfaying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pending disposal of this Writ Petition this Hon'ble High Court may stay the notification vide G.O.Ms No 86 dated 01-O8-2O23' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KOTHA UDAY KIRAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE The Court made the following ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASI(AR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22516 OF 20.23 ORDER:

When the matter was listed on 22.12.202g, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 29.12.2023 under the caption "for dismissal". Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ petition.

2.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for non_ prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPYI/ ASSISTANT REGIS SD/. V.HARI P AD R SECTION OFFICER To

1. Two CCs to Gp FOR pROt-{l-B^lTlON AND EXC.SE, High Court for the State 3p!:"fl ',it1f,l jl#",!ffi."r,:HE;.;,;.;;ropucl

3. Two CD Copies SA GJ $'\a.

HIGH COURT DATED:2911212023 T S A a Et\ q ou 2 S JAll L') i> J'

202[ t , l

ORDER

qEsPAtc WP.No.22516 of 2023 DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON - PROSECUTION I I WITHOUT COSTS \\ r\2) 4+{< \