Elugandhula Chandrashekar Goud, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.4 3 9 4 of 2 0 1 3 & I A.Nos.1 an d 2 of 2 0 1 8 ORDER:

I A.Nos.1 an d 2 of 2 0 1 8 :

The applications are filed requesting the Court to permit the second respondent to compound the offence and record the compromise entered into by the parties and quash the proceedings against the petitioner, who is the accused, in Cr.No.60 of 2013 on the file of the Station House Officer, Raikal Police Station, Karimnagar District.

2.

The parties, together, with their respective counsel, are present in the Court and on being specifically asked, both the parties confirm the terms of compromise recorded in the joint memorandum of compromise appended to the applications.

3.

The terms of the compromise show that at the advice of the elders and well wishers, the parties intend to lead friendly life, as such the differences which arose between the parties are resolved. As per the compromise, the second respondent has no objection to compound the offence and quash the proceedings against the petitioner, who is the accused, in Cr.No.60 of 2013 on the file of the Station House Officer, Raikal Police Station, Karimnagar District. Since, I am satisfied that the aforesaid compromise is executed by the parties out of their free will and they confirm the terms thereof, when being specifically asked, there is no impediment in recording the said compromise.

The applications are accordingly allowed.

CRLP.No.4 3 9 4 of 2 0 1 3 :

In view of the above, the criminal petition is allowed and the further proceedings against the petitioner, who is the accused, in Cr.No.60 of 2013 on the file of the Station House Officer, Raikal Police Station, Karimnagar District, are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________ T. RAJANI, J December 17, 2018 DSK