Myla Saidulu v. The State Of Telangana

[ 31s8 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE JUSTTCE G SRI DEVI / CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7680 OF 2A2L Between:

Myla Saidulu, S/o. Gattaiah, Petitioner/Accused No. 3 AND The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Through (Prohibition and Excise Station, Nalgonda) Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/Accused No 3 in the event of his arrest in connection with COR No. 26 of 2021, Prohibition and Excise Station, Nalgonda The petitlon coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI J P SRIKANTH Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Sole Respondent, the Court made the following,

ORDER

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7680 OF 2O2I ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioner/A-3 seeking to grant anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with COR.No.26 ol 2O2l of P.S. Prohibition and Excise Station, Nalgonda District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 34 (a) of the T.S. Excise Act, 1968.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/A-3, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/A-3 would submit that the petitioner is innocent of the offence alleged against him and has been falsely implicated. The petitioner is having fixed abode and there is no question of absconding. It is further submitted that the petitioner/A-3 is willing to furnish suitable security and abide by any condition which this Court may deem fit to impose in the event of granting anticipatory bail. Hence, it is prayed that the petitioner/A-3 be granted anticipatory bail.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A-3.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing was recovered from the possession of the present petitioner and the other accused, from whose possession recovery was said to have been made, have already been enlarged on bail.

I Thus, looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, without delving into the merits of the same , I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A-3.

The Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner/A-3 is granted anticipatory bail subject to the following terms and conditions:

(1) The petitioner/A-3 is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, P.S. Prohibition and Excise Station, Nalgonda District, within a period of four weeks from the date of this order and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioner/A-3 on bail on his executing personal bond for a sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees lifteen thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to his satisfaction.

(2) The petitioner/A-3 shall comply with the other conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C and co-operate with the Investigating authorities. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

I SDrr- 1,1 "ro*DRASHEI(AR RAO ASSTSTANTREGISTRAR 4 \-r rv //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFIbER To, The lAdditional Session Judge: Nalgond The Station House Officer' p3 ' p'"tiOiti"" and Excise Station' Nalgonda District ;;"";c; sni i p sRIKANTH Advocate [oPuc] ..

Two ccs to PUBLIc pnod'icuiijn'i+gh'cou't it Hvderabad louTl '1 One SPare coPY

HIGH COURT GSDJ DATED:2511012021 foR rt SPEC ,F l4 ,', ?5 4r@

ORDER

CRLP.No.7680 of 2021 BAIL -.ar-l{ i