Gopinath Thota v. The State Of Telangana
I s183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 21392 OF 2024 Between:
Gopinath Thota, Son of Madhava Mohan Rao, aged about 44 years, Occupation Senior Software Engineer, Resident of 1375 Kintyre Way San Jose 951 29, United States of America represented by. GPA Holder Mr. Narendra Kumar Thota S/o Madan Mohan Rao, aged about 46 years, Occupation Business Resident of Main Road, Chinaganjam, Bapatla District, Andhra Pradesh.
...PETITIONER AND The State Of Telangana, Represented by Principal Secretary Horne Decartment, Secretariat, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Hyderabad. The Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), South East Zone, Saidabad, Hyderabad.
The Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP), South East Zone, Malakpet, Hyderabad.
5. The Station House Officer (SHO), P. S. Chaderghat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of I/ANDAMUS By declaring the in action of the respondent no. 3 to 5 not taking any action and not registering FIR on the complaint dt. 13.07.2024 and 30 -O7 .2024 which was given by the petitioner against the 1 . Jogiparthi Venkatesh guptha, 2. Gummi Venugopal Reddy,3. Parsi Vijetha,4. Katikam Ramesh,5. MShailja and 6. Administrator of Shaheen Junior College is illegal arbitrary, and violation of Principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14 of
Constitution of lndia and Consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5 to take action on the complaint dl. 13.07.2024 and 30.O7.2O24 against above mentioned accused persons.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5 to take action on the complaint dt. 13.07.2024 and 30.07.2024 to register an FIR and investigate the matter against the accused persons in the complaint.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATARAMANAIAH K Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETTTION o.2L392 of 2O24 ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter to the Registry. stating that the petitioner instructed him to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTI OFFICER To, One CC to SRI VENKATARAMANAIAH.K, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BSR GJP
HIGH COURT DATED: 121A812024 ile;
o i.( t f( a ll .r t\ -.
\\-o_ \..'\*\ (n f'
0[r
ORDER
1E 2W WP.No.21392 of 2024 <l --_:-:_::- :_ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS @*fE %.