← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCMA/695/2006dismissed for default

Thammineedi Sri Venkata Hari v. Betina Kavita

2018-02-22C.Praveen Kumar,J. Uma Devi1 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI C.M.A.No.695 OF 2006 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice C. Praveen Kumar) As there was no representation for the appellant on 23.11.2017, the matter was adjourned. On 15.02.2018 also, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the appeal was directed to be listed today i.e., 22.02.2018 under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, though the learned counsel for respondent is present.

3. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

4. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR _____________________ JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI February 22, 2018 MD