The Assistant Director Of Horticulture v. The Authority Under Payment Of Wages Act

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PET tTtON NO: 23147 oF 2002 Between:

The Assistant Director of Horticulture, Medak at Sangareddy. PETITIONER AND The Authority Under Payment Of Wages Act, Commissioner of Labour, Sangareddy !mt.Lingamani, W/o Anjaneyglu Working President,Work Charged Employees State Union C/o Shaik Dada Sangareddt l\,4edak District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 1st respondent in l.A.No.8/02 in P.W.Case No.4/200.1 dated 28-05-2002 as wholly without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of section 1(5) and 1 (6) of the payment of wages act, '1936 and aside the same and consequentially dismiss the P.W case No.

4/01 on the file of the Authority under payment of Wages Act-Cum-Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Sangareddy as without jurisdiction WPMP. NO: 29030 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in l.A.No.B ol 2002 in P.W.Case No.4 of 2001 dated 25-8-2002 on the file of the Authority under Payment of Wages Act-cum-Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Sangareddy pending disposal of the Writ Petition. WPMP. NO: 29031 OF 2002 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the further proceedings in P.W.Case No.

4 of 2001 dated 25-8-2002 on the file of the Authority under Payment of Wages Act-cum-Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Sangareddy pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI I W.P. No.2 3L47 of2OO2 ORDER:

On the earlier occasion, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal".

Todav also, even though the matter is listed under caption "for drsmissal". *'hen the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the Petitioner.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition 1s dismissed lor nonprosecution. No order as to costs' Miscellaneous petitions' if any, pending in this writ petition shall also stand dismissed' SD/-V.SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OF ICER To,

1. Two CCs to the GP for Agriculture, High Court for the State of Telangana. (OUT)

2. Two CCs to GP for Labour ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies.

4. One Spare Copy.

PM \'\z-

HIGH COURT DATED:O811112021

ORDER

WP.No.23'147 of 2002 \9 :)r,lf € o i\ ,i ('

q ?t}?1 \- DE o j. i, ): .,1 ..'/'

Y.r Dismissing the WP For non-prosecution Without costs.

@s6,