Shashikala, Pv v. The State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 31831
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PEI{{{$I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 20006 OF 2U26 '
Shashikala, PV, Wo Late. Subbaiah, PV, Aged about 35 years, Occ. House hold, Fl/o Plot No.30/B, Road No.20, Central Bank Colony, LB Nagar, Hyderabad-074 ...PETITIONER 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), Rep. by its Commissioner, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
3. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, CC Complex, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad, Telangana-500063.
4. The Zonal Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Shamshabad Zone, Circle.no.l 8, Shamshabad, R.R. District-S0'1 21 8.
5. The Dy. Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Shamshabad Zone, Circle No. 18, Shamshabad, R.R. District-S01218.
6. Jangaiah, S/o not Known to the petitioner, Ageda bout 50 years, Occ Business, C/o Rice Mill, Beside Pride Residency Apartments, Mankal Village, Maheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
7. Shanker Reddy, S/o not Known to the petitioner, Ageda bout 50 years, Occ Business, C/o Rice Mill, Beside Pride Residency Apartments, Mankal Village, Maheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
PONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the in-action of the respondent no. 2 to 5 to take action against the illegal constructions made by the respondents no.6 to 7 pursuant to the representation dt 06.03.2026, 20.03.2026 and 22.4.2026 over the schedule property
i.e. on Sy.No.121 Parl, and Sy.No.126 Part, situated at Mankhal Village of Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to 5 to take action against the illegal constructions made by the respondents no.6 to 7 pursuant to the representation dt 06.03.2026, 20.03.2026 and 22.4,2026 in respect of schedule property i.e. on Sy.No.12'l Part, and Sy.No.'126 Part, situated at Mankhal Village of Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranela Reddy District ll.
:1 OF Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue interim direction to respondent no.2 to 5 to take action against the illegal :onstructions made by the respondents no.6 to 7 pursuant to the representation dt 116.03.2026, 20.03.2026 and 22.4.2026 in respect of schedule property i'e on l3y.No.12'1 Part, and Sy.No.126 Part, situated at Mankhal Village of Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KONDA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V. NARASIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3,4&5: SRI LAKSHMAIAH' SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6&7:- The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SR,I JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY n Between Shashikala PETITIONER The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban DeveloPment DePartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
RESPONDENTS Heardlearnedcounselforthepetitioner'Mr'v'Narasimha Goud, learned standing counsel for HMDA and Mr' Lakshmaiah Kanchani, learned standing counsel for the respondents No'4 and 5' 2.
Learned standing counsel for the respondents No'4 and 5 submitted that subsequent to the filing of the writ petition' show cause notice dated 27 '06'2026 has been issued to the owner/occupier of the property in Sy'Nos'121 and 126 ' Mankhal Village, Shamshabad, to show cause as to why the unauthorized I t constructionofTinShed/SteelstructureinG+2floorsshallnotbe \ t
removed and if not explanation is offered, appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law.
3.
Recording the aforesaid submission, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4 to complete the enquiry pursuant to the show cause notice dated 27.06.2026, by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the respondents No.6 and 7 and other interested persons and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As this order is passed without entering into the merits of the case, notice to the respondents No.6 and 7 is dispensed with. However. if the respondents No.6 and 7 are aggrieved by this order, they are at liberty to approach this court seeking modification of the order. The miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as costs.
SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII ON OFFICER To, 1 l!"__1r'*i?al secretary, Municipat Administration and Urban devetopment uepartment, Secretariat, T.S.,Hylerabad.
, I119""^ll,i:rl"_"?i Hyderabad nvletropotitan Development Authority (HI/DA), Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, CC Complex, . f3nk Bund Road, Hyderabad, ietangana_5000d3.
4. The Zonal Commissioner, Grea6r Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Shamshabad Zone, Circle.no.1g, ShamshabaA, n.n. District-s0.t218 5 The Dy cornmissioner,. Greater Hyderabad Municipar corporation, Shamshabad Zone, Circle No. 18, Shamshabad, R.R. Districi-So121g: ,
6. One CC to SRt. KONDA SR|NJVAS Advocate tOprCl
7. One CC to SRt. V. NARASTMHA GOUD, SC iOn Hrr,rOn tOpUCl
8. Two CCs to cp FO.R MUNtCtpAL nOrr,rffrriSfnnfrbrV nNO URBAN DEVELOPMENT ,High Court for the State of iJanluna, at Hyderabad [OUT]
g.oneCCtoSRI.LAKSHMAIAHKANCHANI,ScFoRGHMCIoPUC] 10.Two CD CoPies BM TKS II
CC TOD HIGH COURT DATED: 30/06/2026 Hti SI A ( R.I{i n I c f,() o 3 JIJL 2026 .,, WP.No.20006 of 2026 I I * DISPOSIN OF THE WRIT PETITION OSTS c f lzlrt