R.V. Kameshwari Devi v. The District Educational Officer
.\ [ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V,SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION ) NO: 4452 OF 2017 Between:
R.V. Kameshwari Devi, W/o T,L Srikanth, Aged about 46 years, Occ:Telugu Pandit, ZPHS, Yanambile, Khammam District.
...PETITIONER
1. The District Educational Officer, Khammam District, at Khammam.
2. The District Collector, Khammam Dist., At Khammam.,
3. The Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
4. The State ofTelangana, represented its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. .,.RESPONDENTS AN Petition under Section 226 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled to be transferred to the schools Situated in plain area of Khammam District on the basis of the entitlement points in the ensuing transfer counseling since she was appointed/posted in plain area with all consequential benefits in terms of Notification issued in G.O.Ms.No.3 SW dt. 10.01.2000 by holding the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the applicant for transfer to plain area schools is illegal and contrary to the notification vide G.O.Ms.No. 3 dated 10.01.2009 discriminatory and unjust Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. K. SARATH Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABI,E SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN I(UMAR WRI'[ PETITION (TR) No.4452 OF 2077 ORDER:
Today when the matter- has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel Sri,Krishna Kishore Kovvuri, representing learned counsel for the petitioner on record, submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded to the same. 2.
Recording the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous.
3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
SD/-G.SIR HA ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION FFICER To, 1 . Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES ,High Court for the State of Telangana,at Hvderabad IOUTI
2. oire cc to SRt. x. SARATH, Advocate [oPUC]
3. Two CD copies BM SW q
HIGH COURT DATED:1010112023 Or tt 'rt$ NrI n I \ \\ -, \.,
ORDER
)<p tj SPAi WP(TR).No.4452 of 2017 I DrsMrssrNG THE WRrr PETTTTON(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @c"f'''
a3