Mr. Thota Chandrashekar v. State Of Telangana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7717 OF 2021 Between:

Mr. Thota Chandrashekar S/o. Late. T. Rama Rao, aged about 60 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500033.

...Petitioner/Accused No.2

AND

1. State of Telangana represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana.

2. B.Bhoopal S/o. B. Sathaiah, age 40 years, Occ. Proprietor of Trendset Facility Management Services, R/o.H.No. 2-771314, Vivekananda Nagar Colony, Narsingi Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 500089

...Respondent No.1 and No,2/de-facto complainant

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings of the criminal case against the Petitioner/Accused No.2 in FIR No.235 of 2021 dated 13-09-2021 on the file of Golkonda Police Station, Hyderabad.

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the arrest of the Petitioner/Accused No. 2 in FIR No.235 of 2021 dated 13-09-2021 on the file of Golkonda Police Station, Hyderabad pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Krishna Chaitanya, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Prakash Chakravarthy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER

HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.77l7 of 2O2L ORDER:

1 .

The present Crimina-l Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.235 of 2O2l of Golkonda Police Station, Hyderabad.

2.

No representation on petitioner's side on call. 3.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, submits, on written instructions, that case has been referred as lack of evidence and therefore, the Crimina-l Petition has become infructuous.

4.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

5.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shal1 stand closed.

I SD/- NAYANI CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO - ASSTSTANT REFISTRAR //rRUE coPY// L h.,--- SECTION OFFICER I To,

1. The Station House Officer, Goloconda Police Station' Hyderabad'

2. Two CCs to Assistant Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of - Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT] I

3. One CC to Sri M. Krishna Chaitanya, Advocati!9Pu*C] - I I I

I HIGH COURT I Dr. CSL,J DATED:0811'112022 {t I I ,J , o t\) 2B ?t8 ll\1l

ORDER

CRLP.No.7717 of2O21 + \..- ,-. -n -)?

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITIOI!

I \$ {xu