M.Vijay Kumar Reddy, v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W r it Pet it ion No.1 9 1 0 9 2 0 1 8 ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioners in the present Writ Petition is that despite the existence of a duly obtained permission bearing No.1/ C12/ 06869/ 2018, the respondent-Municipal Corporation authorities are not permitting the petitioners to proceed with the construction by virtue of the impugned notice. On the other hand, it is submitted by Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Municipal Corporation that the notice impugned is only a show cause notice and in reality, the petitioners herein submitted an explanation on 13.05.2018 to the said show cause notice and the matter is pending consideration before the respondent-Municipal Corporation and suitable final orders will be passed, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks.

A perusal of the impugned notice discloses that the said notice is only a show cause notice proposing action under Section 450 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. Since the petitioner herein already submitted his explanation on 13.05.2018 and having regard to the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition, with a direction to the respondent-Municipal Corporation to pass final orders pursuant to the impugned show cause notice, dated 03.056.2018, within a period of two weeks from today, strictly in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI Date : 11.06.2018 smr