Pothuri Ramakrishna Raju v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V. SESHA SAI W RI T PETI TI ON No.1 9 2 2 8 OF 2 0 1 8 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by Sri S.Laxminarayana Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 - Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation that the respondentsauthorities are not interfering with the construction activity, as alleged by the petitioner herein, and if any constructions are made in deviation to the sanctioned plan, it may be kept open for the respondents to take action as per law. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents-authorities to proceed strictly in accordance with law. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed in consequence. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A.V.SESHA SAI , J 1 2 .0 6 .2 0 1 8 TSNR