Ayesha Tabassum (Previous Name Avula Nikitha), v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE P.KESHAVA RAO WRI T PETI TI ON No.35976 of 2014 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner who is appearing as a party-in-person.

2.

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under: 'It is therefore humbly prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondents for registering FIR No.458/2014 dated 08-11-2014 on the file of the Police Pet Basheerabad, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, is against the life and liberty of the petitioner and his husband as such are illegal, ultra vires, null and void, and against the fundamental and constitutional rights of the petitioner, in the interest of justice and equity or pass any other orders as deem fit in the circumstances of the case.'

3.

The learned Government Pleader placed on record the written instructions dated 09.01.2020 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Pet Basheerabad Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. 4.

From the perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that on the complaint of the third respondent herein, a case in Crime No.458 of 2014 was registered under the heading 'woman missing' of Pet Basheerabad Police Station on 08.11.2014. In the said complaint, the third respondent alleged that her daughter Avula Nikitha left the hostel without intimating to anyone and did not return back, and therefore, he suspected one Mohammad Jaffar. It is also mentioned in the instructions that during investigation, it was disclosed that the missing woman married the suspect alleged by the third respondent and living with her husband and leading a marital life. Therefore, after completion of the investigation, the

case was referred as 'action dropped' and a final report was filed before the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, on 26.06.2015. 5.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the said crime was registered on the complaint lodged by the father of the petitioner herein, and as such, it can safely be inferred that the petitioner suppressed the material facts as stated in the written instructions and filed the present writ petition with all false and baseless allegations. Hence, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 6.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs. ____________________ JUSTI CE P.KESHAVA RAO Date:09.01.2020 PGS