← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/29304/2009dismissed

Smt.Kusumatai Dandekar (Appellant No.1 Died By Her Lr) v. The Joint Collector,

2024-01-08J Sreenivas Rao4 pages

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 29304 OF 2009 Between:

1. Smt.Kusumatai Dandekar (Appellant No.1 Died per LR),

2. Smt.Daya Dendekar Wo.M.Krishnanandam, aged 63 years, Occ: House hold, FJo.12-10-212, Sithaphalmandi, Secunderabad.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The Joint Collector, Adilabad.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District. 3- The Tahsildar, Karimnagar, Mancherial, Adilabad District. ' 4. Smt.Bhoopathi Rajeshwari, Wo.late Ramulu Household No.2-4-147, Neat Vasanth Talkies, Mancherial, Adilabad District. The Conditional Order dated 30.04.2013 has not been complied with. Hence, given effect to and WP stands dismissed as against Respondent No.4.

,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order passed by the 1st respondent dated 18.12.2OO9 disposing the Revision Petition i.e., Case No.D4l1 '162109 filed by the 4th Respondent under Section 9 of A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Paftedar Pass Books Act 1971 at the admission stage setting aside the orders passed by the 2nd Respondent vide Procgs. No.G/152112006 dated 24.1O.2OO9 and also

), directing the 2nd respondent to entertain the Cross appeal filed by the 4th ' Respondent, without any notice' without providing an opportunity to respondents in the revision and without assigning any valid reasons as nothing but arbitrary' illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the procedure contemplated under Section 9 of A'P' Records of Right in Land and Pattedar Pass Books Act 1971 (herein after referred to as the ,.RoR Act,'). Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

)/ HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO UIRIT PETITION Nos.293O4 of 2OO9 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed questioning the order passed by respondent No.1 in Case No.D4l1162/2009 dated 18.12.2OO9 under Section 9 of A.P. Record of Rights in land and Pattedar Pass Books Act, 1971.

2.

After perusal of the records, it reveals that the writ petition is dismissed against the contesting respondent No.4 for non-compliance of the conditional order dated 3O.O4.2O13 and by virtue of the dismissal of the writ petition against contesting respondent, the petitioner is not entitled to seek aly relief in the writ petition. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

sD/- P. PADMANABH ASSISTANT RE REDDY ISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to SRI V. RAVI KIRAN RAO' Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue' High Court for the Slate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI Two CD CoPies Y+- MP GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:0810112024 L e A v i{ .-\ N ,.r) * Lp t) o \.\ -a

ORDER

\)- t c WP.No.29304 of 2009 1$ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 6 c.g*+ +{'