State Of Telangana, v. Biruda Raju Raghu Narayana Raju,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.848 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.

No.

Date

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 1.

24.08.2023 CJ & TVKJ I.A.No.1 of 2023 Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any.

Mr. Malugari Sudharshan, learned Government Pleader for Forest Department, for the appellants. Mr. J.Venkateswara Reddy, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr.

T.Srikanth Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents No.3 to 5. Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2023.

This interlocutory application has been filed seeking leave of this Court to implead the proposed appellant herein as an appellant in the writ appeal. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, this interlocutory application is allowed.

(contd..in next page)

I.A.No.2 of 2023 Mr. Malugari Sudharshan, learned Government Pleader for Forest Department, for the appellants. Mr. J.Venkateswara Reddy, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr.

T.Srikanth Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents No.3 to 5. Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2023.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, we find that sufficient cause on condonation of delay of 147 days in filing the appeal is made out.

In the result, delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the interlocutory application is allowed. (Contd..in next page)

I.A.No.3 of 2023 For the reasons assigned in the application, requirement of filing the certified copy of the order is dispensed with.

In the result, this interlocutory application is allowed.

W.A.No.848 of 2023 Writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

(vide separate judgment).

B/o.

vs