Pragathi Degree College For Women,Hyd,And 2 v. Dist Collector,Hyd,And 3

[ 33e3 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE ANO THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1961 OF 2013 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against order dated 30-9-2013 in W.P.No.1088112010 on the file of the High Court. Between:

'I . Pragathi Degree College For Women, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad rep. by its President, R. Rajeshwar Reddy, S/o. Laxmikanta Reddy Hindu, age about 55 years, FJo. 16-1 1-51 1/40, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

2. Pragathi Juniot College for Girls, Dilsukhnagar, rep. by its President, 8, Raleshwar [ed!y, S/o. Laxmikanta Reddy, Hindu, age'about 55 years, No. 16-11 -511 lCl40, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. 3- Noble Degree College, Dilsukhnagar, rep. by its Correspondent R. Rajeshwar Reddy, S/o. Laxmikanta Reddy, Hindu, age about 55 years, Rt/o. 16-1 1 -51 1 lcl40, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.

...APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS AND '1 - The District Collector, Hyderabad District.

2. The Tahsildar, Saidabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

3. The Commissioner, Social Welfare Department, Masabtank, Hyderabad.

4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WAMP. NO: 4019 OF 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the recovery in pursuance of the proceedings in RC.No.A2l6921200O dt.8-4-2OOg and 21-4-2OOg and the cons-equential Distraint orders issued on 20-4-2O'lO including recovery of

Scholarship amounts realized and paid to the students of scheduled caste community, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Appe[ant: SRI E.V.S.S.ACHARYULU (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Gp FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Gp FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT APPEAL No.l961 of 2013 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) None appears for the parties.

2. It appears that the appellants are not interested ln prosecuting the Writ Appeal.

3. Therefore, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/. M.MANJULA DEPUTY F(TGISTRAR 4/ SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// .t To,

1. One CC to SRI E.V.S.S.ACHARYULU, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATTON, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CCs to cP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE, Hiqh Court Ior the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies BSR GJ

HIGH COURT DATED: 2111212023 {\{e STAT€ a U i{ 2t2[ o q o .+ t .l< ,r'! C

JUDGMENT

WA.No.1961 of 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL FOR NON.PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS @ot'* 6rsq-