Bishop Reuben Mark, v. P. Madhu,
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Between:
Bishop Reuben Mark, s/o. late Shadrach, Bishop, CSI Karimnagar Diocese, Aged about 53 years, Having office at CSI Cathedral Compound, Karimnagar (Subordinate office of the Church of South India - Head office at Chennai) and another.
.. Petitioner/2nd respondent (defendants 2 and 4) AND P.Madhu s/o. Prakasham, aged about 41 years, Occu: Business, r/o. H.no.2-1-347, Desipet, Warangal and another.
.. Respondents/Petitioners (Plaintiffs) Rev. Y.Johin s/o not known, aged about 45 years, Presbyter-in-charge, CSI Desaipet Pastroate Churck, Warangal, (Subordinte office of the Church of South Indi), Krimngr Diocese and two others.
.. respondents/respondents (defendants 1,3 & 5) This Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO ORDER:
Heard Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad, learned senior counsel for petitioners and Sri K.Vivek Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2.
2. The grievance of petitioners is, Interlocutory Application is not disposed of in spite of readyness of respondents and ex-parte injunction order is continued indefinitely. It emerges that though earlier few adjournments were granted at the instance of the plaintiffs/petitioners, subsequently the matter underwent adjournments at the instance of the respondents/petitioners. Therefore, it cannot be said that the trial Court was accommodating the plaintiffs/petitioners and in spite of readiness of the defendants/respondents, the matter was not disposed of. It appears from copies of the docket order that matter is coming up for submission of arguments on behalf of respondents/ petitioners herein. On 06.05.2016 matter was adjourned to 03.06.
2016 at the request of counsel for respondents to make submissions on behalf of the respondents and thereafter adjourned to 06.06.2016. Learned counsels informed the Court that today when the matter was called, as the Advocates abstained from attending to the Court proceedings in view of the strike called for by the Bar Association, matter was adjourned to 16.06.2016.
3. Learned senior counsel for petitioners as well as counsel appearing for the respondents submit that both the counsels are ready to make their submissions and time may be fixed for disposal of the I.A. Having regard to the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of requesting the trial Court to dispose of I.A.No. 2151 of 2015 in O S No.1176 of 2015, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks.
Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in this revision shall stand closed. No costs.
___________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
kkm Oval: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
kkm