Nadella Naga Lakshmi v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.22584 OF 2019

ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare that the petitioner is entitled for regularization of the service as Vocational Junior Lecturer from the date of her appointment (1.9.1990) and consequently direct the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner as Vocational Junior Lecturer from the date of her appointment and grant all attendants and consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents in not regularizing the service of the petitioner as Junior Lecturer as unjust, unreasonable arbitrary, discriminatory and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper."

Heard Sri M.Venkat Ram Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondents. It is the case of the petitioner that she was appointed as Part-time Vocational Junior Lecturer on 1.9.1990 in Medical Lab Technology Courses in Government Junior College. Though she has rendered more than 29 years of service, the respondents have not regularized her services. The 2nd respondent has addressed a letter dated 10.10.2018 to the 1st respondent recommending the case of the petitioner for regularization of her services. But the 1st respondent has not passed any orders so far.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that appropriate orders be passed directing the 1st respondent to consider the recommendations made by the 2nd respondent for regularization of services of the petitioner. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the case of the petitioner would be considered by the 1st respondent based on the recommendations made by the 2nd respondent and appropriate orders would be passed, if not already passed. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Writ Petition can be disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of her services based on the recommendations made by the 2nd respondent and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, if not already passed, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI 17th October, 2019 rkk