Dibbapalem Grama Ikya Vedika Nirvasitula Sangham v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33080 of 2010 DATE: 07.07.2015 Between:

Dibbapalem Grama Ikya Vedika Nirvasitula Sangham

...Petitioner

and State of Andhra Pradesh and others

...Respondents

COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER : NONE APPEARED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS : AGP FOR REVENUE (AP) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33080 of 2010

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: "For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioners herein humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue writ, or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not permitting 25 individuals whose names are enclosed appointment orders and also in not providing the benefits under R.R.Package including the house sites of 100 Sq.

yards to all the 253 displaced persons who are identified for the village of Dibbapalem Village, Gandyada Mandal, Visakhapatnam is illegal, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to permit the 25 individuals displaced persons who lost their livelihood due to formation of Gangavaram Port who are issued with appointment orders but not allowed to join duties and also (b) to provide all benefits of R.R.Package with houses on 100 sq.yards to all the 250 people who are appointed by the District Collector in a developed lay out and near the Jetti to facilitate these displaced persons to work on the boat repairs and to do some other ancillary fishing work."

On 27.11.2013, this Court has observed that there has been persistent absence on the part of the counsel for the petitioner. Subsequently, the case was adjourned either at the request or for nonappearance. Even today, when the case is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing its cause in the Writ Petition.

The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.

As a sequel to dismissal of writ petition, WPMP.No.42011 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 7th JULY, 2015.

kvni