Surpam Murali, v. The State Of Telangana

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.7577 of 2015 ORDER:

Heard both sides.

The petitioner states that his father, Surpam Bheemrao, was killed by extremists on 28.12.1992 at Malini Village, Kagaznagar Mandal, Adilabad District and the said crime was registered as F.I.R.No.163/92 by Kagaznagar P.S. The petitioner further states that he has applied for consideration of his case under the policy of the Government for rehabilitation of victims under G.O.Ms.No.50, dated 21.02.2014 and the said application is still pending. It is also stated that the petitioner is willing to take appropriate employment and if that is not possible, ex gratia in terms of the policy of the Government as aforesaid, and alleging inaction, the present writ petition is filed. Similar matters were already disposed of by this Court. Hence, following the order, dated 02.02.2015, in W.P.No.

1633 of 2015, this writ petition is also disposed of accordingly and the operative portion of the order is as mentioned below: It is pointed out by learned Government Pleader that in terms of G.O.Ms.No.50, dated 21.02.2014, if the petitioners are opting for compensation, they are required to execute an appropriate undertaking to be eligible for ex gratia. Learned counsel for the petitioners also states that the petitioners are willing to execute appropriate undertaking, as and when called upon to do so.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to take appropriate decision on the applications filed by the petitioners, referred to above, by taking note of the fact that the petitioners are seeking ex gratia, in lieu of employment in terms of G.O.Ms.No.50, dated 21.02.2014, and process the said application and if the petitioners are found eligible, respondent No.2 shall ask the petitioners to execute appropriate documents to be able to receive ex gratia in terms of the scheme, referred to above. Since the incident has occurred almost in the year 1989, it is imperative that appropriate decision is taken, as directed above, expeditiously, preferably before the end of April, 2015." As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J Dt:23.03.2015 kdl