M/S Nandan Biomatrix Limited, Hyd v. Herbz India, Kerala And 2 Others

=\ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 264 OF 2012 Appeal filed under Section 37 (1 ) (b) of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 against the order and decree dated 31/03/201 1 in Arb.o.P.No.972 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad' Between:

M/SNANDANB|OMATR|XL|M|TED,HYD,RepbyitsDirector,Ol'at8-21201112188 and 89 Aparna crest, ll floor, Road No. 2, Baniara Hills, Hyderabad - 5oo 034'

...APPELLANT(') AND HERBZ lNDIA, O/at FCC Building, Mavoor Road, Kozhikode [Calicut] lt t.p- C"otg", S/o Paily F/o Mittamana House, Keerampara, Chelal [PO] Kottamangalam, Eranakulam Dist.

Hon,ble AiUitrator Sri M.Krishna Rao, Advocate [Sole Arbitrator] Rio H.No. '162-742lN2O5,Yamuna Towers, Usmangad, Malakpet, Hyderabad' ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI T BALA MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRl. K K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No-2 & 3: NONE APPEAREO The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.264 OF 2Ol 2 JUDGMENT:

When the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that this matter has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission of learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Asa sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed sD/- B.S.CHTRANJE/Vr --'Jorir'i ft;iaid;i / \ SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY// 't. The Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (with records, if any)

2. One CC to SRl. T BALA MOHAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. K K DURGA PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD CoPies "\-y-

HIGH COURT DATED:1111212O23

JUDGMENT

CMA.No.264 of 2012 o 1HE Sr47€ ( q ou J 1 5 ilAn zo2{ t t €O PAfC\l * DISMISSING CMA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS c2 ^