P. Mattapalli Rao v. The State Of Telangana,
[ 32ee ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 3636 OF 201 6 Between:
1. P.. Maftapalli R99, S/o Ramachandraiah, aged about 62 years, r/o. Thogarrai village, Kodad Mandal, Nalgonda District.
2. Smt. P.Chandrakala, Wo. Mattapalli Rao, aged about 58 years, r/o. Thogarrai village, Kodad Mandal, Nalgonda District
3. Likki Venkataiah, S/o. Gangaiah, aged about 50 years, r/o. Thogarrai village, Kodad Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...PETITIONERS AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Suryapet, at Surypet Town and Mandal, Nalgonda District.
3. The Station House Officer, Kodad Rural Police Station, at Kodad, Nalgonda District.
4. 9r!. Y Jayamma, W/o. Prasad, aged About 30 years, r/o. Thogarrai village, Kodad Mandal, Nalgonda District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the Cr. No. 315 of 2015 registered for an offence punishable U/Ss. 504, 5O6 of IPC and Section 3 (iXx) of SC ST (POA) Act against the petitioners on the false complaint of the 4th respondent and quash the same by holding the same as being illegal, arbitrary l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO:4648 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of all further proceedings including the arrest of the petitioners in connection with Cr. No. 315/ 2015 for an offence punishable U/Ss. 504, 506 of
IPC and Section 3(i)(x) of SC ST (POA) Act on the file of the 3rd respondent herein, pending the disposal of the above W.P. l.A. NO: 1OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 4130 OF 2016) I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in I ll ;l the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the FIR in Cr. No. 315/2015 on the file of the Kodad Rural Police Station, Nalgonada District for the present in the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to3: SRI SAI RAM, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: - The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.3636 0F 2016 ORDER:
This writ petition is hled seeking direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Cr.No.315 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under sections 5O4, 5O6 of IpC and Section 3 (i) (x) of Sc ST (POA) Act against the petitioners on the false complaint of the 4th respondent and quash the same. 2.
karned counsel representing on behalf of petitioner would submit that the cause in this writ petition does not survive, as the petitioner is no more arrd the crime was also closed and hence seeks to dismiss the writ petition as infructuous. 3.
Mr.Sai Ram, learned Assistant Government pleader takes no objection to the same 4.
Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT R ST //TRUE COPY// I t \ I SECTION OFFICER To,
1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVIE ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
2. ohe cc to 'sRl V. enRHuntRu cHowDARY, Advocate [oPUC]
3. Two CD Copies BM GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:1211212023 rrE STATE o,c '' i 2t2\ v ol'
q :) Co
ORDER
'/ J( llr '
WP.No.3636 of 2016 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS llb t