K. Hari Shankar Goud, v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.212 of 2015 ORDER:

This criminal revision case, under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., is filed by the petitioners/A1 and A2 challenging the order, dated 21.01.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1655 of 2014 in C.C.No.92 of 2014 by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Special Court for Prohibition and Excise Offences at Sangareddy. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/A1 and A2, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent No.1/State and perused the record.

3.

Notice sent to the respondent No.2/complainant returned with postal endorsement "unclaimed". Therefore, notice is deemed to be served on the respondent No.2/complainant. 4.

The petitioners/A1 and A2 filed the subject Crl.M.P.No.1655 of 2014 in C.C.No.92 of 2014 before the Court below under Section 239 Cr.P.C. seeking their discharge in the subject Calendar Case, contending that the petitioner/A1 filed a suit for cancellation of sale deed bearing document No.4574/2006, dated 18.02.2006 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy vide O.S.No.15 of 2012; the said suit was decreed; since the civil Court upheld the

rights of the petitioner/A1 and by virtue of the said judgment, the criminal Court is seized of the matter. It was argued on behalf of the State in the subject Crl.M.P.No.1655 of 2014 that the allegations levelled against the petitioners/A1 and A2 constitute offences under Section 406, 418, 420, 423 and 120B of IPC and the truth will come into light only after fulfledged trial. The Court below, considering the submissions made by both sides, dismissed the subject Crl.M.P.No.1655 of 2014 holding that there are no merits in the contentions raised by the petitioners/A1 and A2. That led to filing of this Criminal Revision Case by the petitioners/A1 and A2.

5.

In the course of submissions, a request was made on behalf of the petitioners/A1 and A2 that if a direction is given to the Court below to dispose of the subject C.C.No.92 of 2014 expeditiously, the same would suffice.

6.

The said submission is taken on record.

7.

In view of these circumstances, the Court below is directed to dispose of the subject C.C.No.92 of 2014, pending on its file, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three(3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8.

With the above direction, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J Date: 03.01.2023 ssp