M.Laxmaiah v. M. Padmalatha

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2281 and 2288 of 2016 COMMON ORDER :

These two revisions are filed against the common order in I.A.Nos.3405 and 3406 of 2015 in O.S.No.160 of 2009 filed under Section 151 C.P.C. and under Order XVIII Rule 17 of C.P.C. respectively to reopen and to recall DW.3 for the purpose of crossexamination by the defendant Nos.1 and 2 i.e., the revision petitioners.

2.

During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners filed affidavit to permit limited right to cross-examine DW.3 with reference to pleadings in his written statement and learned counsel for the respondents agreed for the same without going into the merits of the case.

3.

Therefore, in view of the concession of both the counsel, the revisions are allowed by setting aside the common order passed by the trial Court, dated, 28.12.2015, in I.A.Nos.3405 and 3406 of 2015 in O.S.No.160 of 2009 for the limited purpose of cross-examining DW.3 confining to the pleadings raised in the written statement filed by the revision petitioners, without touching the merits of the case. 4.

Miscellaneous petitions pending in both the revisions, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J 18th July 2017.

mar