Kolipaka Sri Laxmi v. Sri Somesh Kumar, Ias And 6 Others

\ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENW NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1208 OF 2022 Contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience to the orders of the High Court dated 19n12022 in lA No. 1 of 2O22 in WP No. 2152 of 2022. Between:

Kolipaka Sri Laxmi, Wo M. Kranti Kumar, Aged 46 years, Occ Assistant, R/o H.No. 15-2-3l1lDl1 , Sri Datta Nilayam Kaviraju Khammam.

School Nagar, .,.PETITIONER AND

1. Sri Somesh Kumar, lAS, Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. Sri V. Karuna, lAS, The Principal Secretary, School Education, Secretariat,

3. V.P.Goutham, lAS, The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.

4. Sri Anudeep Durishetty, lAS, The District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudern District, Kothagudem.

5. Sri S. Yadaiah, The District Educational Officer, Khammam District, Khammam.

6. Sri E. Soma Sekhara Sharma, The District Educational Officer, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Kothagudem.

..CONTEMNORS/RESPONDENT

7. Smt A. Sritlevasena, lAS, Commissioner and Director of School Education, ...CONTEMNOR/THIRD PARTY lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pbased to

I grant leave to the petitioner to implead the 7th respondent as contemnor in the present contempt case in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICD T. VINOD KUMAR co CASE No- L2OB of 2022 ORDER:

1.

This Contempt Case has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dt.lg.Ol .2022 in IA.No.l of 2O22 in W.P.No.2152 of 2022.

2.

When the matter is taken up hearing, it is stated by the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondents, that pursuant to the above said order, the respondents disposed of the appeal preferred by the petitioner vide Memo No.8678/Ser.II /At /2022-1, dt.27 .OT .2022, considering the case of the petitioner. A copy of the said proceed.ing is served on the learned. counsel for the petitioner in the Open Court. 3.

Learned Government pleader further submits that though there has been some delay in implementing the above said order, the same is purely on account of administrative reasons and is neither willful nor wanton.

4.

Having regard to the fact that the respondents, though with some delay, have complied with the above order passed by this Court, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.

SD/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUT-Y REGISTRAR (--y) SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY// Sri Sornesh Kumar, IAS and 6 Others, Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Sri V. Karuna, lAS, The Principal Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Z b,MV.P.Goutham, lAS, The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.

4. Sri Anudeep Durishetty, lAS, The District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Kothagudem.

5. Sri S. Yadaiah, The District Educational fficer, Khammam District, Khammam.

6. Sri E. Soma Sekhara Sharma, The Diskict Educational Officer, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Kothagudem.

7. Smt A. Sridevasena, lAS, Commissioner and Director of School Education,

8. One CC to SRI P. RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Advocate [OPUC]

9. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI i i 10.Two CD Copies.

ri 1 I . One Spare Copy.

I I I NPJlT i i II I 1_

t HIGH COURT DATED:2910712022 /-ta=::-r c -l_ -/ rfl \'tll q r) L :)3 t)

ORDER

CC.No.12O8 of 2O22 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS.

ffi lt lq