Ramesh Agarwal v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

[ 32es ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 103 of 2014 Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Order dated 8-10-2013 made in Crl.M.P.No.3636 of 2013 in CC No.2087 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad. Between:

'1. Ramesh Agarwal, S/o Late Meherchand Agarwal.

2. Rajender Agarwal, S/o Late Meherchand Agarwal. ...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS I A1 IO 4.2, AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P., Hyderabad.

2. Rajesh Modi, S/o Om Prakash Modi.

3. Manoj Aganrval, S/o Satyanarayan, ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONOENTS/PETITION ERS/A3 tO A4 Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI CHETLURU SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI KHAJA VIZARATH ALl, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondents No.2 & 3: ---- The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUCIOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.103 0F 2014 ORDE R:

The present Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the order dated 08.10.2013 in Crl.M.p.No.3636 of 2O13 in C.C.No.2087 of 2010 on the file of the 1earned XI Additional II Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad. 2.

Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioners and Mr. Khaja Yizarath Ali, learned Assistant public prosecutor appearing for respondent-State.

3.

Learned counsel for the revision petitioners would submit that the subject matter of the Revision doesn,t survive and no further orders are required in this Criminal Revision case. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the criminal Revision case as infmctuous.

Learned Assistant Public prosecutor takes no objection to the same.

Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed Sd/. B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To, '1. The XI Additional Chief Mekopolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

3. One CC to SRl. CHETLURU SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies BR/kam

HIGH COURT DATED:0310412024 k oR 'f HE S14 r4r

ORDER

Jc L) D i luN 2024 (1\( zo CRLRC.No.103 ot 2014 {+ * o,, spa tc HEo DISMISSING CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS