High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/836/2015dismissed as infructuous

M.Babaiah v. The State Of Telangana And Another

2022-12-16Chillakur Sumalatha4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 836 OF 2015 Between:

1. M.Babaiah, S/o Kishtaiah, Aged: 65 years, Occupation: Retd. Govt. Service, R/o H.No.5-4-1299/8, Plot No.37i6, Sharadanagar, Near Nandini Public School, High Court Colony, Vanasthalipuram, R.R.District ...PETITIONEFYRESPONDENT AND 1 . The State of Telangana, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT

2. Smt. M.Padma, W/o M.Babaiah, aged 54 years, occupation: Household, Rl/o H.No.'1-3-151/E/18, Rajendranagar, Mahabubnagar ..RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Criminal Proceedings initiated against the petitioners in D.V.C.No.14 ot 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 at Mahabubnagar including the presence of the petitioners before the said Criminal Court. l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRLPMP. NO: 748 OF 2015) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of '54'days in resubmitting above Criminal Petition SR.No.47954 of 2014.

l.A. No: 2 OF 2015(CRLF]4P. NO: 892 OF 20't5) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in D.V.C.No.14 oI 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magist.ate of First Class, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 at Mahabubnagar including the presence of the petitioners before the said Criminal Court.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. UMA RANI, Advocate representing M/s. RAVI KONDAVEETI, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.l and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER

HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.836 of 2O15 I ORDER:

Seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in D.V.C.No. i4 of 2014, on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Mahabubnagar, the present Criminal Petition is filed. 2.

Smt.Uma Rani, learned counsel representing Sri K.Ravi, learned counsel on record for the petitioner, submits that the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Sd/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Protection of Women from Domestic Violance Act, 2005, at Mahabubnagar.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

3. One CC to Sri RAVI KONDAVEETI, Advocate tOpUCl

4. Two CD Copies.

Njb plp Bs\

HIGH COURT DATED:1611212022 '{ HE STA 14:

\ (f 2 4 JAtl ?.ul

ORDER

CRLP.No.836 of 2015 DISMISSING THE CITIMINAL PETITION.

I c-p-> Bs(