← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/18949/2016dismissed

Matta Ravindra v. The State Of Telangana,

2017-11-072 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH The Hon'ble Sri Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Hon'ble Sri Justice M. GANGA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.18949 AND 33756 OF 2016 W.P. No.18949 of 2016:

Between:

Matta Ravindra S.o.Venkateswar Rao Aged: 47 years, Occ: Senior Assistant, Judge Family Court, Khammam, Khammam District ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Law & Legislation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

.. Respondents W.P. No.33756 of 2016:

Between:

Matta Ravindra S.o.Venkateswar Rao Aged: 47 years, Occ: Senior Assistant, Judge Family Court, Khammam, Khammam District ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Law & Legislation Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

.. Respondents For Petitioners : M/ s.Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao Sri Syam Sundar Kondapalli For Respondents : G.P. for Law & L.A.

Sri S. Sri Ram Smt. Bobba Vijayalakshmi

VRS, J & MGR, J WP Nos.18949 &33756 of 2016 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.18949 AND 33756 OF 2016 COMMON ORDER: (per V. Ramasubramanian, J) Aggrieved by the out of turn promotion given to the reserved category candidates, the petitioner in both the writ petitions, who is working as a Senior Assistant has come up with the above writ petitions.

2. Heard Mr. Syam Sundar Kondapalli, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Bobba Vijayalakshmi and Sri S. Sri Ram, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

3. In the second writ petition, the persons who are allegedly juniors to the petitioner and who secured a march over the petitioner have not been made parties. In the first writ petition a private individual, who gained promotion along with the petitioner, despite being a junior, has been impleaded.

4. The out of turn promotion given to the 3rd respondent was on account of the fact that she belonged to the reserved category.

5. The Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, have been implemented under G.O.Ms.No.123, General Administration, dated 19.04.2003, providing for rule of reservation in the matter of promotions. The Rule is not under challenge. Therefore, the grievances of the petitioner cannot be redressed.

6. Hence, the Writ Petitions are dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

_____________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J _______________ M. GANGA RAO, J November 07, 2017 KTL