Aluri Anasurya v. State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26780 0F 2021 Between:

Aluri Anasu Sri Krishna Dist.

rya, W/o. Srinivas Age 45 years, Occ Household Rt/o. H.No. 6-2-11A, Nagar, Khanapuram Haveli, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam ...PETITIONER AND State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad District Panchayat Officer, C/o. Collectrate, Khammam Gram Panchayat, V.Venkatayapalem, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary V.Venkatayapalem village, Raghunadhapalem Mandal Khammam Disirict ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action the 3rd Respondent in issuing the Proceedings through Rc.No.

GP 0912021 dated 1111012021 without authority and without issuing any notice or enquiry to the Petitioner in utter violation of principles of natural justice without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice etc and consequently set aside the Proceedings through Rc.No.GP 0912021 dated 1111012021 of the 3rd Respondent and grant lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Proceedings of the 3rd Respondent through Rc.No,GP 0912021 dated 1111012021, pending disposal of the dbove Writ Petition and grant Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. N V ANANTHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.

1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRl. G.

I

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR \ilrit Petition No.2678O ot 2O2L ORDER:

Sri G.Narender Reddy, learned standing counsel, appearing for the 3.d respondent - Gram Panchayat, fairly submits that the impugned proceeding dated ll.lO.2021 issued by the 3'd respondent was without notice to the petitioner. 2.

The learned standing counsel seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the impugned proceeding by granting liberty to the 3.a respondent to initiate proceedings afresh, in accordance with law. 3.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that if the authorities follow the due process of law, he has no objection, since the petitioner would have right to file objections thereto. 4.

In view of the above, since it has been stated before this Court by the learned standing counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent that the 3!d respondent is withdrawing the impugned proceeding dated 11.1O.2O21, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition.

5.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ^,/ To,

1. One CC to Sri. N V Anantha Krishna, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to Sri. G. Narender Reddy, SC for Gram Panchayat (OPUC)

3. Two CCsto GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Courtforthe State of Telangana. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies.

5. One Spare Copy.

,* d'

HIGH COURT DATED:2711012021

ORDER

WP.No.26780 ot 2021 trE SrAr€ ( d 1z No'l?g?l e o!

\* t,.

Closing the WP Without costs.

1/