Kalla Sankara Rao And 4 Others v. The State Of A.P. And Another

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.7 0 7 8 of 2 0 1 3 ORDER:

The counsel for the petitioners does not press upon the grounds raised in the quash petition. But, however, he contends that the DVC pertains to the year 2013 and that divorce was obtained in the year 2004 and that considering the said fact, a direction may be given to the lower court to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

Finding merit in the said submission, the lower court is directed to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months.

The Criminal Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Interim stay granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T. RAJANI , J November 27, 2017 LMV