← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/24361/2011dismissed no costs

Bandaru Satyanarayana Murthy v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2015-07-27Sanjay Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * WRIT PETITION No.24361 OF 2011 Between:

Bandari Satyanarayana Murthy .. Petitioner And The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District at Machilipatnam and others. .. Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 27-07-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.24361 of 2011 ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioner in this case was that the police authorities were not investigating Crime No.172 of 2011 on the file of Nuzvid Rural Police Station, Krishna District. Though the petitioner stated in the affidavit that the said crime

ought to have been registered under Section 307 I.P.C. and not under Sections 324 and 326 I.P.C., no prayer was advanced by him in this regard in the writ petition. His only grievance was that the police authorities were not investigating the said offence. Relying on the written instructions dated 24.07.2015 received from the Station House officer, Nuzvid Rural Police Station, Krishna District, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home informed this Court that basing on the complaint made by the petitioner, Crime No.172 of 2011 was registered under Sections 324 and 326 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. on the file of Nuzvid Rural Police Station on 12.07.2011. After due investigation, the police authorities laid a charge sheet before the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nuzvid, vide C.C.No.1033 of 2012. A copy of the said charge sheet is also placed on record.

In the light of the afore-stated developments, the grievance of the petitioner as to the failure on the part of the police authorities to investigate Crime No.172 of 2011 stands redressed. The writ petition therefore does not survive for consideration on this count and is accordingly dismissed.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

____________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR 27th July, 2015 IBL