B.Thukaram v. The Secunderabad Club

[ 3260 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF IMARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY SECOND APPEAL NO: 107 OF 2001 Appeal Under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 02-1 12000 made in A.S.No.71 of .1999 on the file of the Court of the 1't Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, preferred against the Decree in O.S.No.598 of 1996 dated 15-07-1999 on the flle of the Court of the Xl Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.

Between:

B.Thukaram, S/o.Eswaraiah, aged 55 years, R/o.6-1-279118/1, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad.

.....PLAINTIFF/RESPON DENT/APPELLANT AND The Secunderabad Club, Secunderabad.

.....DEFENDANT/APPELLANT/RESpONQENT Counsel for the Appellant : SRI.P.INDRA PRAKASH (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents : SRI.ASADULLA PASHA The Court made the following Judgment : -

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY SECOND APPEAT NO.107 OF 2OO1 JUDGMENT:

This second oppeol under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, l90B is directed ogoinst lhe judgment ond decree doled 02.1.l.2000 in A.S.No./l of 1999 on the file cf I Additionoi Chief Judge, City Civil Courl, Secunderobod.

2.

No representotion on beholf of the oppellonl in spite of listing the motter under ihe coption "for dismissol''. lt oppeors thot the oppellont is not evincing ony inleresl in prosecuting lhe molter.

3.

Accordingly, lhe Second Appeol is dismis:;ed for nonprosecution. No cosls. Pending miscelloneous opplicotions, if ony, sholl siond closed.

SD/-T.SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR L'ID I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To The 1sr Aclditional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, $ecunderabad. (With Records, lf any) The Xl Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad. One CC to SRI.P.INDRA PRAKASH, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI.ASADULLA PASHA, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies J SA 6,?

l I

HIGH COTJRT DATED:1 510312023 I :I$6 srarq SA.No.107 of 2001 i zB Jur2$n v\

JUDGMENT

* r,] Dq;

DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR NON - PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

?

6 l2t 1Y:v