Ananthula Lingamma And 2 Others v. Lakkaraju , Danthala Panduraganaiah And 12 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3443 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 2485 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 01-10-2019 passed in 1.A.No.870 of 2019 in O.S.No.1'1 ot 2013 on the file of I the Court of the ll Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet. I Between:
1. Ananthula Lingamma, W/o. Janaiah, Age. 55 years, Occ: Housewife, H.No.14-2491153, KK Road, Suryapet Town and District.
2. Shaik Lal Mohammed, S/o. Chand Ali, age.60 years, occ. Business,
3. ShaikAzeeza Begum, Wo. Shaik Lal Mohammad, Age.52 years, occ. House wife, Petitioner 2 and 3 are Rl/o. H.No.1-8-43/3/A, Church Compound, Suryapet Town and District.
...Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants No.5,7 and 8
AND
1. Lakkaraju @ Danthala Panduraganaiah, S/o. Late Venkata Ratnam, age. 83 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Bondrai Bazar, Suryapet Town and District.
2. Lakkaraju @ Danthala Ravi Prasad, S/o. Lakkaraju @ Danthala Pandurangaiah, Age. 54 years, occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Bondrai Bazar, Suryapet Town and District.
3. Lakkaraju @ Danthala Srinivasulu, S/o. Lakkaraju @ Danthala Pandurangaiah, Age. 48 years, occ. Working Contract Bill Collector R/o. Bondrai Bazar, Suryapet Town and District.
4. Vuppu Haritha, W/o. Late Uppu Ramprasad, Age.46 years, occ. Housewife, Rl/o. Rand T Colony, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.
5. Lakkaraju Hemamber, S/o. Lakkaraju @ Danthala Pandurangaiah, age. 44 years, occ. Working at Private Junior College, Tarnaka, Secunderabad
6. Lakkaraju Sarojanamma, W/o. Lakkaraju @ Danthala Pandurangaiah, age.76 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Bodrai Bazar, Suryapet Town and District.
...Respondents/ Respondents No.1 to 6 /Plaintiffs
7. Bathini Pedda Yellaiah, S/o. Muthaiah, Age. 46 years occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Epoor Village of Athmaku(S) Mandal of Suryapet District. B. Ananthula Gopamma, W/o. Late Ramanarsaiah, Age. 89 years, occ. Housewife, F|/o. H.No.1-4-2 491153, KK Road, Suryapet Town and District.
9. Ananthula Janaiah, S/ o. Late Ramnarsaiah, Age. 6'l years, occ. Agriculture and Business, RL/o. H.No. 1-4-2491153, KK Road, Suryapet Town and District. i I
,*-l;r*-y,/ --7
10. Ananthula Rammurthy, S/o. Late Ramnarsaiah, age. 51 years, occ. Agriculture and Business, Rl/o. H.No. 1-4-2491153, KK Road, Suryapet Town and District.
l l.Ananthula Mounika, D/o. Venkanna, Age. 31 years, occ. Student, R/o. Maruthi Apartments, 60 Feet Road Suryapet Town and District. l2.Anathula Venkanna, S/o. Janaiah, Age.53 years, Occ. Business. Fl/o. Maruthi Apartments, 60 Feet Road Suryapet Town and District.
13. Pandipalli Navatha, W/o. Purnachander Rao, Age. 36 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No. 1-2-2701371311, Krishnanagar, Suryapet Town and District
...Respondents/Respondent No.7 to 13/Defendant No.1 to 4,6,9 & 10
(Respondents No.7 to 13 are not necessary party in this Revision) lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.1 1 of 2013 on the file of the ll Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet pending disposal of the Civil Revision Case. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri V.V. Satish Counsel for the Respondents: - The Court made the following: ORDER
I -
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OT TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA I CrvIL REVISION PETITION No.2485 OF 2019 Date:31.12.2025 Between:
Ananthula Lingamma w/o Janaiah and others "., Petitioners AND Lakkaraju @ Danthala Panduranganaiah and others
...Respondents
ORDER:
Today when the matter has come up before this Court lor hearing, Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsei for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not sun ive for lurther ad.iudication and has become infructuous.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous polr::1tf "1t".9 q?dil& lhall stand dismissed. SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI STANT REGISTRAR i/TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,
1. The ll Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Surya
2. One CC to Sri V.V. Satish, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies et Kam/Sa Fr-
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212025 Y a,R THE S .J o * 0 7 rry
ORDER
CRP.No.2485 of 2019 i THE CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS 5coP\"'
X.,,