N. Prashanth v. The Telangana State Nothern Power Distribution Company Ltd
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 32se ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEI\iIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 27031 OF 2021 Between:
N. Prashanth, Sio Bhumaiah, aged about 30 years, Employee l.D No' SOOOzzSS, Artisan Grade - ll (U/S), 33111 KV Sub-station, Chandur, Bhodhan Division, R/o Koratpally Viilage, Dichpaly lt/andal, Nizamabad Distrtct, Telangana State ..,PETITIONER AND The Telangana State Nothern Power Distribution Company Ltd, Corporate Office, at Vidyuth Bhavan, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, PIN - 506002, rep. by its Chairman and lvlanaging Director The Chief General Manager (HRD), TS NPDCL, Corporate Office, Vidyuth Bhava, Nakkalagutta, Hanamkonda, Warangal District, PIN - 506002, The Superintending Engineer (Operation), TS NPDCL, Nizamabad Circle, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District, Telangana State
4. The Divisional Engineer (Operation), Bhodhan Division, TS NPDCL, Bhodhan Circle, Bhodhan, Nizamabad District, Telangana State.
5. The Divisiolrai Engineer, (Enq.ll and Enquiry Officer) TS NPDCL, Warangal, Warangal District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High'co"rrt ,rv -ou pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction partLurarry one in the nature of writ of mandamus, decraring the action of the 3rd Respondent in initiating the departmentar Enquiry against the petitioner oy appointinl ir.," -sil., Respondent as the Enquiry officer ind the action of the- 5th ResponJent- in initiating the departmental Enquiry, vide Memo. No. DEE (Enq.lt / f.fpOdll Wgi I F.No. 2509/21lD.No. 85/2-1 , dated 07-09-202i, during ir," benaen"y cririi"r case in cr' No. g5 0f 201g, on the same issue and on the same set of racts, as arbitrary, illegar and viorative of Articres 14, 16 and 21 of the constitrtion or lndia, contrary to law declared.by the Hon,ble supieme court in catena of cases and consequen,y set-aside [\,4emo. No. Oee (lnq.f l / N'DCL lwgf -l F.N..
..}:,?x,#ll l:fu :[il il{],?.1*,,;; x1'.P,r il " sr Crass rrltigi;rr;," "iNi;:";
:'i *",'sru i"J i ff ?,, :,:l IA NO: 10F 20 21 Petition under Secr Iii"rl'5iliflt i:i",, ifJi:xixr?,yi,1,i ff,ffiHi:'ffix":,:s 5;1#:[i[tf li!&,il,""",?^=7;"Iii?'i,xstll"-tl]1,";lmt,,ru No ss or 20ie ;; t'ff;f'^::9 bY''lu Sth Respond' Nizamabad---pe-n;i;;;.ffi ,:l jml5UWY;:,T''I|X,'L:,..^,:UU,:* Counsel for the petitioner: SRI CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA Counsel for the Respondents: - _ _ _ The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.27O31 of 2O2l ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner has addressed a letter d.ttted 28.12.2022 to the Registry requesting to post the matter under the caption "for withdrawal".
2.
In view of the letter submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ pelition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
3.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall also stand dismissed as withdrawn. SD/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSTSTAN/tEglsrRAR //TRUE COPY// e 1l )-' - -- SECTION OFFICER I 'O,,,. on" CC to SRI CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA, AdVOCAIE TOPUC]
2. Two CD CoPies BN GJP |\
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212022 * S"t ,:v^"
ac \ta ,'5 o {,
ORDER
"
{ WP.No.27031 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \\D