M/S Sai Enterprises, Chennai v. M/S Victor Transformers And Switchgears Ltd., R.R. Dt. And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 714 OF 2015 Between:

1. M/S SAI ENTERPRISES, CHENNAI, Rep. by its Proprietor Suravaram Divakar, Plot No.'l 2, D.No.36, Kanakamal Colony, Chennai, Tarnil Nadu State ... PETITIONERYACCUSED AND

1. M/S VICTOR TRANSFORMERS AND SWITCHGEARS LTD., R.R. DT. AND ANR, Plot No.8, lndustrial Estate, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District.

... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

2. State of Telangana,, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Hyderabad.

..,RESPONDENT

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 12912014 on the file of the lll Specail Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad in the interest of justice l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLPMP. NO: 730 OF 2015) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioner in C.C.No.129l2O14 on the file of the lll Special Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Crl.P. in the interest of Justice This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and NA for the Respondent No.1 The Gourt made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.714 OF 2015 ORDER:

The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.I29 of 2Ol4 on the lile of the learned III \ Special Magistrate, Errarnanzil, Hyderabad (for short, "the trial \ , , court").

2.

Heard Mr. Anand, learned counsel representing Mr. P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vizarath Ali, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent State.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit the C.C.No.I29 of 2Ol4 before the trial Court has been transferred to some other Court. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition while granting liberty to lile an appropriate application after obtaining instructions with regard to the re-numbered Calendar Case 4.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor takes no objection to the same

ta: .1 5.

Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in accordalce with law.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- MOHD.ISMAL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER To, The lll Special Magistrate, Erramanzil' Hyderabad The Station House Officer, Marredpally'

or"-cC to SRl. P NAGEIIDRA REDDY Advocate [oPUC] f*o cG to PUBLIC PROSECUToR, High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD CoPies AA NS

I t HIGH COURT DATED: 0211112023 I 1\.\E STAI

ORDER

o [ 3 JAN 202[ P a\ CRLP.No.714 ot 2015 t,l + * T o i] o THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS 614^oW