← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/4385/2014withdrawn

M.Ravikanth v. Smt.R.Jhansi Laxmi

2024-02-09Sambasivarao Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU CIViL REVISION PETITION NO: 4385 OF 2014 Petition filed under Section 22 of AP Rent Control Act-1960, against Order dated 27-10-2011 passed in RA.No.334 of 2010 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, Preferred against the Order dated 27 -O9-20oo passed in RC.No.108 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad.

Between:

1 . M.Ravikanth, S/o. M.Narasimha Rao, Occ: Business, R/o. '149, Vasavinagar, Secunderabad

2. M.Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Late N.Parwaiah, Occ: Business, Rio. 149, Vasavinagar, Secunderabad

3. Smt.M.Rupa, Wo. M.Venkateswara rao, Occ: Business, R:/o. 149, Vasavinagar, Secunderabad

4. Smt.M.Prasanna Laxmi, Wo. M.RAvikanth, Occ: Business, R:/o. 149, Vasavinagar, Secunderabad ...Appellants/Petitioner AND Smt.R.Jhansi Laxmi, Wo. R.Nageswara Rao, Occ: Business, H.No. 1-2288/18 Domalguda, Hyderabad

...Respondent

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP. NO: 5984 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuance to order dated 27-09-2006 in RC.No. 108 of 2004 on the file of the learned Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad and as confirmed in RA.No. 334 of 2010, daled 27-1O-2O11 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Courts, Hyderabad Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU CTVIL REVISIOI{ PETITION No. 4385 of 2014 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the revision petition.

2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed .

Sd/. G,STREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAB SECTI ly ON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// \ To,

1. The Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad

2. The Additional Rent Controller, Secunderabad i. One CC to Sri. Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar' Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD CoPies PSR/gh Y{

HIGH COURT DATED:0910212024

ORDER

CRP.No.4385 of 2014 ,,.. , c .lf r' t'l ('

(i ou o2 nl.'r zru , + .\:\.

DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS WITHDRAWN e 06<\ Pr a€v