Smt. Nethani Sumathi v. The State Of Telangana

Date: 25.10.2019 Between :

Smt.Nethani Sumathi Petitioner And State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad & others.

Respondents This court made the following :

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue and perused the record. 2.

Briefly noted, facts are, petitioner applied for mutation of her name in the revenue records vide application dated 18.6.2019 in respect of land to an extent of Ac.0.08 guntas in Survey No.575/A of Parakala village and mandal, Warangal district claiming to have purchased under registered sale deed No.621/2013 dated 4.4.2013. It appears that such a request was also made in the year 2015. The present application is made in continuation to the earlier application. In response to the same, 4th respondent-Tahsildar vide memo dated 26.9.2019 rejected the said request, directing to go before Civil Court. 3.

According to the learned counsel for petitioner, there are no rival disputes and no objections were filed on the application filed by the petitioner.

4.

The order passed by the Tahsildar does not contain any reasons as to why petitioner should avail civil law remedy. On this ground alone, the order passed by the Tahsildar is liable to be set aside and is accordingly set aside and the matter is remitted to the 4th respondent-Tahsildar for considering the application made by the petitioner on 22.6.2015 followed by representation dated 18.6.2019 afresh on merits. The Tahsildar shall pass appropriate speaking orders, in accordance with law and communicate the

same to the petitioner. This exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. 6.

The writ petition is accordingly allowed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J Date: 25.10.2019 DA

25.10.2019