Smt.Sharada Bai And Another v. Vishwanath Agarwal And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4257 OF 2013 Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India, of Civil Procedure Code, againsU aggrieved by the Order dated 2910712013 made in lA No.3B14/2010 in AS No.2B9l2008 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad.

Between:

1. Smt.Sharada Bai, Wio Om Prakash Gupta House hold R/o H.No.21-2-13117 to 9, Charkaman, Hyderabad.

2. Om Prakash Gupta, S/o Late Ganeshlal Business F/o H.No.21-2-13117 to I, Charkaman, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS AND

1. Vishwanath Aganval, Rep.by its GPA L.Amarnath S/o Late Laxmaiah Business, F/o H.No.21-2-115to 117 Charkaman, Hyderabad.

2. The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep.by its Commissioner Tank Bund Road' Hvderabad ...RES'.NDENTS/ RES'.NDENTS/ APPELLANT- RESPONDENT NO.3 CRPMP. NO: 5777 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in A.S.No.2B9 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad.

For the Petitioners : SRI K.V.SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU, Advocate For the Respondents :

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY C,R.P.No.4257 of 2013

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is arising out of the order dated 29.07.2013 passed in 1.A.No.3814 of 2010 in A.S.No.289 of 2008, on the file of ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, filed by the petitioners/respondents under Section 1 07(2) and Order Vl Rule 17 read with Section 151 of C.P.C., seeking amendment of the plaint in O.S.No.3821 ot 2004 on the file of Vlll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad.

2.

Learned counsel for revision petitioners is called present. 3.

On perusal of the case status, which was tagged along with the main case, reveals that the appeal suit itself i.e. A.S.No.2B9 of 2008 was disposed of on24.07.2018, hence, the civil revision petition is listed under the caption "lnfructuous Matters". Therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in the Civil Revision Petition and this revision has become infructuous.

4.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

5.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,/- -tlo \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To

1. The llAdditional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to Sri K.V.Subrahmanya Narusu, Advocate (OPUC)

3. Two CD Copies

4. One Spare CoPy Ki. ^'v

HIGH COURT DATED0610412022 , 2 t AUB 2[?]-

ORDER

CRP.No.4257 ot 2013 DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS CIt fls W