K.Krishnam Naidu, v. M/S Laxman Finance,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1102 OF 2005 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the second respondent-State. The present Criminal Revision Case is filed questioning the judgment passed in Crl.A.No.135 of 2004, dated 03.01.2005 on the file of IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, confirming the judgment passed in C.C.No.512 of 2002, dated 10.05.2004 on the file of the Court of V Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, convicting the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,53,500/- to the complainant, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for further two months.

When the matter is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in spite of his best efforts made, he could not contact the petitioner and that the petitioner is also not contacting him. In these circumstances, the learned counsel expressed his inability to proceed with the matter. Taking the said submission into consideration, this Court presumes that the petitioner is not interested to pursue with the matter. Be that as it may, since there is no response from the petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the counsel for the petitioner to move an appropriate application as and when the petitioner contacts him.

In view of the dismissal of the present Criminal Revision Case, the trial Court is directed to take steps for execution of sentence as per the judgment passed in C.C.No.512 of 2002.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ P.KESHAVA RAO,J 13th AUGUST 2018.

Tsr