← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/3141/2016disposed of no costs

Syed Khaja Qutubuddin v. The State Of Telangana

2016-03-11Raja Elango2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.3141 OF 2016 ORDER:

This Criminal is filed by the petitioner, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., challenging the order, dated 11.02.2016 in Crl.M.P. No.104 of 2016 in M.C. No.416 of 2015 passed by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBBC cum Additional Family Court, Hyderabad, whereby the learned Judge directed the petitioner to pay Rs.6,000/- per month to the 2nd respondent and Rs.3,500/- each to the respondents 3 & 4 as interim maintenance.

The 2nd respondent is the wife and the respondents 3 and 4 are the children of the petitioner. They filed M.C. No.416 of 2015 before the Court below seeking maintenance. They also filed Crl.M.P. No.104 of 2015 before the Court below against the petitioner seeking interim maintenance at Rs.10,000/- per month to the 2nd respondent and Rs.5,000/- each to the respondents 3 and 4, pending disposal of the maintenance case. The Court below partly allowed the said application granting interim maintenance at Rs.6,000/- per month to the 2nd respondent and Rs.3,500/- per month to the respondents 3 and 4. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed. Heard and perused the material available on record.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Criminal Petition is disposed of modifying the impugned order, as follows: The petitioner is directed to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month to the 2nd respondent and Rs.

disposal of M.C. He is directed to pay the said maintenance amount on or before 10th of every succeeding month and also the arrears if any, calculating at the same rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the M.C., as expeditiously as possible without being influenced by this order and the impugned order.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________ RAJA ELANGO, J March 11, 2016.

KTL