← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/829/2015dismissed as infructuous

Chebrolu Chalapathi, Khammam Dist v. Sakhamuri Suguna, Khammam Dist

2022-12-30A.Venkateshwara Reddy3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

[ 3218 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEI\,,,IBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 829 OF 2015 Petition under seclion 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against by the Order dated 20.06.20'1 '1 made in l.A.No.88/2010 in O.S.No.992/2006 on the file of the Prrncipal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam.

Between:

CHEBROLU CHALAPATHI, S/o Venkaiah, aged 60 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/O H.No.4-19, V. Venkatayapalem, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam district. ...PETITIONER/PETITION ERYDEFENDANT AND SAKHAMURI SUGUNA, WO Venkata Satyanarayana, aged 40 years, Occ: household and agriculture, R/O 4-40, V. Venkatayapalem, Khammam Urban Mandal, Khammam district.

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF CRP.M.P. No. 1089 of 2015 Petition under Section 151 of CPC Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S. HNo. 992of 2006, on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. MEHERCHAND NORI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR The Court made the following:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISIO N PETITION NO.829 OF 2OL5 ORDER:

None appears on behalf of the revision petitioner. Learned counsel on behalf of the respondent present and submitted that the suit has been decreed long back itself. Verilied the case status information. Wherein it is reflected that original suit in O.S.No.992 ol 2006 was decreed with costs on 15. 11.2017, rhis Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the orders dated 20.06.20l I in I-A.No.88 of 2Ot0 in O.S.No.992 of 2006.

2. Therefore, in view of the disposal of the original suit as stated above no cause survives, this Civil Revision petition is I dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to the costs. Miscellaneous I applications, if any pending, shall stands closed. I Sd/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,..11 1r\ '

I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, '1. The Principal Junior Civil Judge at Khammam, Khammam District'

2. One CC to Sri MEHERCHAND NORI, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies 't^.<

HIGH COURT D ArED:3011212022

ORDER

C1 CRP.No.829 of 2015 /\ c l \ itl JAil 2023 DISMISSING THE C.R.P AS INFRUCTUOUS \? \".$u-