P. Parimala v. The Mandal Educational Officer

132s7 | HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 20314 OF 2018 Between P. Parimala, D/o. Sreeshailam aged about 47 years, S.G.T, MPPS, Kasthuribha Nagar, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Ri/o. Kasthuribha Nagar, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Mandal Educational Officer, Malkajgiri Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

2. The District Educational Officer, The District Educational Officer Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad

3. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, State of Teiangana, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

4. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its, Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not awarding '10' spouse points to the petitioner as per Rule 6 c of the Telangana Teachers (Regulation of Transfers) Rules,201B, is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, against Rule 6c of the Transfer Rules,2018 and violation of Articles 14 and 1 6 of the constitution of lndia and COnsequently hold that the petitioner is entitled for '10' spouse points in ensuing transfer counseling, 2018 with all consequential benefits.

lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to award '10' spouse points to the petitioner in the ensuing transfer counseling,20l B as per the Rule 6c of the transfer Rules 2018. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P LAXMA REDDY REP. SRI. P VEERABHADRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION No.20314 of 2OLB ORDER:

Mr.P.Laxma Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri P.Veerabhadra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

2.

The said submission is taken on record 3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/. K. VENKAIAH AS'.rANr#)NE:II:

\ To, //TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRl. P VEERABHADRA REDDY, Advocate.[OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

3. Two CD Copies SB GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:2110712023 -i E STA I-€ o ( 't ,a I- t 1., r'.) 11 ru$ NB .i: ,!

). t-/ rl . r'

:..,/'

i ,t

ORDER

WP.No.20314 ot 2018 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS )o7> I