Jogula Kavitha v. The State Of Telangana
[ 31681 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 22215 OF 2025 Between:
Jogula Kavitha, W/o Jogula Naresh, Aged about 40 years, Employee, Fi./o. H. No.. 12-7-138/'1 , Near SLR Apartments, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
Occ. PM Mettuguda, ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep By its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, TS Secretariat, BRKR Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad. The Director General of Police, Telangana State, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad, Police Commisionrate Banjarahills, Hyderabad The Station House Officer, Jubileehilts Jubileehills Police Station, Hyderabad, Telangana.
...RESPONDENTS Petltion under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in registering multiple FIR's against the petitioner's husband namely Jogula Naresh which are arising out same set of facts and similar cause of action as being illegal arbitrary and to the contrary of the settled principles of law and consequently direct the respondent's to club and treat all the pending and future registration of FIR's or complaints made by the complainants as one and the same and further to direct the respondents to refrain from registering multiple complaints as against the similar and same set of facts in.
lA NO: 1 OF 2Ct25 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to strictly follow the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP No.22037 of 2021 and consequently direct the respondents not to register FIR's in respect of the same set of facts indicated in the afore mentioned crimes, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAMAVARAM CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRT JUSTTCE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.22215 OF 2025 ORAL ORDER:
Mr.R.Chandrashekar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. He had made an endorsement to the said effect on the bundle.
2.
Permission is accorded.
3.
Accordingly,, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the circurnstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shalI stand closed.
SD/. AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ISTANT REGI //TRUE COPYII / SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI RAMAVARAM CHANORASHEKAR REDDY, Advocate. loPUCl
2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies.
*N BSK LS
HIGH COURT DATED:04.10812025 - o , ^.1 .,S 20 0[i ':) :
2W
ORDER
,/ WP.No.222:,15 of 2025 c3 r,r !'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS b g lv'
It,