Dr. Ch.Padma v. The Govermnet Of Andhra Pradesh

I [ 3301 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 2263 OF 2011 Between:

1. Dr. Ch.Padma, W/o Dr. Ch. Muralidhar Rao, Aged about 46 years, Lecturer in Telugu, Sarojini Naidu Vanitha Mahavidyalaya, Exhibition Grounds, Hyderabad.

2. Smt. B.Vanaja, W/o G.Venkat Reddy , Aged about 40 years ,Lecturer in Chemistry, Sarojini Naidu Vanitha tt4ahavidyalaya, Exhibition Grounds, Hyderabad.

3. Smt. K.Eswari, W/o M.S.Sridhar, Aged about 39 years , Lecturer in Chemistry, Sarojini Naidu Vanitha Mahavidyalaya, Exhibition Grounds, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONERS AND

1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Secretary to Goverment of Higher Education Dept., AP. Secretariat Hyderabad.

2. The Director of Collegiate Education, AP., Nampally, Hyderabad.

3. The Principal, Sarojini Naidu Vanitha Maha, Vidyalaya, Exhibtion Grounds, Nampally, Hyderabad.

4. Exhibition Society, rep. by its Secretary, Exhibition crounds, Nampally, Hyderabad R4 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 14-2-2011 in WPMP 397712011 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring.the action of the respondents in not paying the salary attached to the post of Lecturer in Degree Colleges to the petitioners despite working as Lecturere in Telugu/ Chemistry for more than 20115/13 years respectively as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to pay the salary attached to the post of Lecturer in Degree Colleges

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 2807 OF 2011 ) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners as Part time Lecturer in Degree Colleges till the pay scale attached to the said post in given, pending disposal of the above WP Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. B. RAJESWARI REP SRl. S. SATYAM REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1&2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3&4: - The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.2263 of 2OLl ORDER:

This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not paying thc salary attached to the post of Lecturer in Degree Collegcs Lo the petitioners de spite of working as Lecturers in Telugu/Chemistry for more Llnan 20/15/13 years respectively.

2.

When the matter is taken-up for hearing, Smt.B.Rajeswari, learned counsel representing Sri S.Satyam Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and th(j matter has become infructuous.

3.

Recording thc submission made above, this writ petition 1S dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs. SD/-B. SARASWATHI ASSTSTANILSEGISTRAR (=D SECTION OFFICER To,'1. Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ,High Court for: the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

2. One cC to SRt. S. SATYAM REDDY, Advocate toPUCl

3. Two CD Copies BM GJP w //TRUE COPY//

\ I HIGH COURT DATED:01 11112023 I tAe STAT€ o q o,\ L) 4WP.No.2263 of 2011 l t :]E5 P^1c ? 1 NS\ .tu'i

ORDER

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6.,{ut ,ffi"