K. Abdul Khadeer, v. Sri Hari Kiran Ias

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Contempt Case No. 50 of 2017 JUDGMENT:

Mr.K.V.Raghuveer, representing the petitioner, submits that the disobedience complained in the contempt does not subsist as on date and requests the Court to close the contempt. The statement is placed on record and the contempt case is dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________ S. V. BHATT, J January 27, 2017 Kv

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Contempt Case No. 50 of 2017 January 27, 2017 Kv