Ramavath Muni v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,
[ 31831 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITIO N NO:9621 OF 2015 Between:
Ramavath Muni s/o. Harichandra Ramavath, aged about 27 years,.occ: student, nio. ft.Uo.tO-S3, Dubba Tanda village P.A. Pally Mandal, Nalgonda District' .
...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, HYderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Police Hyderabad City, office at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
3. The station House Officer, central crime station Police station Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondent No.3 in investigating into cr.No.199/2013 though the said crime is registered on 24-122013, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to complete the investigation and to file charge sheet before the concerned Magistrate, in accordance with Law, to grant.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 12667 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent No.3 herein to arrest the accused persons in relation to cr.No. 1Sgl2O13, pending disposal of the main writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. DATTANAND (NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.9621 Of 2015 ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on L9.12.2024, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it was directed to be listed under the caption'For Dismissal'. Even today, neither the petitioner appears nor there is any representation on his behalf. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
AssrsrA:t'P+*S+Ilt \ ITTRUE COPY,, loN oFFICER ** '{ reransana a'i To, ; i["*;*;f:::::::#;"::fi1'":?"
3. Two CD Copies MP BS 1r
HIGH COURT DATED:2611212024
ORDER
WP.No.9621 of 2015 TA r5:
t.
c O5 FEB a .!
2[i5 * * D rl t, T DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS Y*- L 25k {"'\