Marripelli Sudhakar, v. Ms.P.Pravinya Ias,

[ 32e61

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1895 OF 2024 Petition under Section 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedience and for violation of the order dated 08-072022 in W.P.No.28456 of 2022. Between:

Marripelli Sudhakar, S/o. Manipelli Veeraiah, aged about 62 years, occ Agriculture, Ri/o. H,No.3-85, Dharmasagar Village and Mandal Hanmakonda District, Telangana Marripelly Rajendar, S/o. Manipelli Bhumaiah, aged about 63 years, occ ' Agriculture, R/o.H.No.4-10197, Dharmasagar Village and Mandal, Hanmakonda District, Telangana ...PETITIONER/Petitioner.No.l & 2 in W.P'no'2a456 of 2022 AND Ms.P.Pravinya lAS, The District Collector, Hanmakonda District, Telangana' 1) Mr.G.Sadanandam, The Tahasildar Dharmasagar Mandal' Dharmasagar, Hanmakonda District, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS/Respondent.No.2 & 4 in W.P'No'28456 ot 2O22 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to implement the court order passed by this Hon ble High court of Telangana passed the order on 08.o7.2022 in wP No. 28456 of 2022.

lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under order 1 Rule 10 r/w section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to permit petitioner to be brought on record as the R3 by impleading them in the above CC.No.1895 of 2024. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. Om Law Firm Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1495 of 2ol24 ORDER:

This Contempt Case is filed alleging non_compliance of the order, dated O8.O7.2O22 passed by this Court in Writ petition No.28456 ol 2022, wherein this Court while disposing of the writ petition directed the respondents to consider the representations dated 24.06.2019 and 2I .lO.2O2l , registered as Grievance Registration No.WGUDC/E /2O2IlO12t8 dated 08.11.2021 and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight(g) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The respondents were further directed to put all the persons interested or whose names are shown in online Dharani Portal and the revenue records, on notice in respect of the subject land and pass orders.

2.

The learr-red counsel for the impleaded respondent No.3 has submitted that in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court, the respondent No.2 District Collector, has issued proceedings No.D1/ 16sa/ 2022/98 and Dt / r65s /2022/92 d,ated LT.06.2023 approving the correction o[ extent of land in respect of petitioncrs herein, without issuing any notice to the respondent No.3 herein. It is further submitted that challenging the said proceedings, the respondent No.3 has fired w.p.No.29659 of 202.4 on the file of this

a\ rir.

Court and this Court vide order 24.10.2024 granted interim order directing the official respondents not to take any further steps in pursuance of the said proceedings dated 17.O6.2023 issued by the respondent No.2, pending disposal of the writ petition. 3.

In view of the above, this Court is of the view that there is no willful or deliberate intention on the part of the respondents to initiate proceedings under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

4.

Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. However, it is left open to the petitioners to agitate their grievance if any, in the pending Writ Petition, in accordance with law. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- A.V.S. PRASAD D PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFTCER V

1. One CC to M/s. Om Law Firm [OPUC] 2.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUe,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana To, touTl

3. Two CD CoPies kam

HIGH COURT DATED:0710312025

ORDER

CC.No.1895 of 2024 i I I I I !

i I I I I I ti THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED C."fa Yk, {^aa \\''